If before a man's treachery was enough tolerant attitude, now, a changed man is strictly condemned by the public.
Even half a century ago, male treason simply was not discussed. Everyone knew about this, but they were silent, tolerated and accepted the situation as it is. Marriages did not dissolve to the right and to the left due to the fact that the man was not faithful to his second half.
Now things are different. About infidelity, shout at all corners, not counting this purely personal and intimate. What should not be brought to the court of the public.
Women at all times frightened male treason. True, they are always ready to believe in the best. But all the same: believe - do not believe, and this fear arises almost immediately, together with the arisen feeling. There is love - there is fear of betrayal. It turns out that, from the very beginning, a woman starts programming herself for a certain negative. This could have been avoided if the right attitude to male infidelity had initially been established in society. This does not mean that we must regress and return to the times of our forefathers. Perceive this phenomenon as a matter of course. In no case! Correctly to treat male treason - it's just able to own some psychological techniques that will save the female psyche from unnecessary, contrived suffering. It is necessary to learn how to properly, react and adequately treat any problem, even to such scrupulous. Agree that the right attitude to any phenomenon of our life allows you to soberly and critically look at the situation and take cold-blooded decisions that are not simple. It's all about our psychological illiteracy, that's why the attitude to infidelity in our minds is a chaotic set of concepts and a couple of ways to fight in this situation.
Male dignity from betrayal does not suffer, at least, so all the representatives of the stronger sex believe. And women, on the contrary, are convinced that they are trampled, humiliated and offended to the depths of the soul by this step. Not many men rush to leave after the act of infidelity, they assure the injured party that they still love her very much and feel trembling feelings for her. Some individuals manage to even inspire a woman, that in this way he gave her the deepest respect. Explaining this by saying that he did not want to force to intimacy at a time when she was ill, or was not ready. The reason can always be found. Here everything depends on the man's resourcefulness. Thus, they seem to let us know that there is no humiliation. Men are polygamous by nature. Hence the male infidelity.
If a man is not dear to you, then it is not worth it, they are suffering. We talked and dispersed in different directions, on the way taking out a negative, but all the same experience.
If a man is dear to you, and you do not want to part with him, take a wait-and-see attitude, useful for two. During this time, either alone or with the help of a specialist (which is welcomed), you must literally re-form the correct attitude towards male treason. Where, what is the "right attitude" - you will decide only yourself and determine all the criteria for correctness.
Only a small correction: it is necessary to act from the point of view of tremendous love for oneself.
There is no recipe for happiness, there is no 100% guarantee that your union will pass this problem. Therefore, we must find in advance ways to self-improvement, to the formation of a new worldview, which will subsequently help to properly treat men's infidelities and adequately respond to them. And such weapons, psychological security can be enough for male treason to pass you, frightened of your readiness for any threat. And who knows, maybe it is you who, after living a long and happy life, write instructions for descendants: "how to treat men's infidelities correctly".