Reasoning on the theme of women's careerism

Modern representatives of the fair sex are inclined to believe that the conquest of the career peak is almost the most important achievement in life. It's like "long distance running", in which a woman must win, otherwise she will feel like "not at ease". Of course, this is the charter of only those ladies who decided to sacrifice the status of keeper of the home, went headlong into the world of victories and career achievements. Today we decided to speculate about women's careerism from the point of view of psychology, comparing the career with the marathon race. In the end, this comparison is not at all random, because in all languages ​​of the Romance-Germanic group the concept of "running" and "career" is denoted by the same word.


In move

A career-making woman is the same as a lady's zarulm: the moving object that conditionally poses a threat to itself and the environment has become frantic. She is never ready to postpone for tomorrow what needs to be done the day before yesterday, and for this reason she must sit at work to the victorious end, which, as a rule, is closer to the beginning of the next working day, during which everything can be repeated in the same accuracy.

With a good boss, as a rule, they associate a dispassionate, intelligent and cold-blooded person. All these magnificent qualities have very little in common with purely feminine behavior: spontaneous, unpredictable, emotional. In the event that a woman tries, with the help of volitional efforts, to educate an ideal boss in herself, she simply suppresses the female principle in herself. That's just this process is very often stuck in the middle of the way and the image of a half-beggar-half-woman comes out.

Women very often love to base their perception of everything that is happening around, on the principle of "like - not like", and not "necessary - unnecessary". Women's teams are always dominated by pet-lovers, as well as gossip, podsizhivaniya, unmotivated promotions and dismissals. The work of the staff is so damaging in terms of revenue or business activity rating, and, of course, as the heart and temperament dictates. Finally, the female headmistress has a tendency to treat subordinates as if to children.

And what is left for the home for the family? The fact that the problem in their personal lives is, the women's bosses will not tell, for this they have a personal psychologist. As a rule, the second half of such a lady should be a man who is too fatigued. That's just the problem of a categorical lack of time for the preparation, washing and cleaning costs in the family is very acute. Of course, there is reliable household equipment and for an additional fee a responsible housekeeper. It is much more difficult to communicate, because the evening in the career of a careerist usually turns into a selective production meeting: on the phone (with both the home and mobile at the same time), problems are discussed with oneself like them, and "live" by the life companion of life, sometimes do not have even minutes to talk about earthly topics. As for the bed, these women very often pull their paranoia there - "they do not respect, they do not appreciate, they dig up" - and this "third partner" does not give piquancy to sex.

Weekend? As a rule, they pass in constant pursuit of "raising the level": personal growth trainings, seminars, courses ... Some still try to attend the gym, guided by the fact that they say ladies with a good figure are much easier to climb a slippery career ladder.

Sometimes it happens that the ubiznes-lady husband, after some time, begins to completely relax and loses all desire to somehow earn money. Of course, this is not a typical situation, but the exception did not correct it. The problem of motherhood is another "underwater stone" in the worldview of a woman careerist.

Why these jumps?

Everyone knows that the representatives of the stronger sex make a career or money mainly in order to impress the lady. The traditional explanation of women's careerism is to be independent of men. Like, today there is a man, but tomorrow there is not. So, the careerist is still initially preparing for defeat on the personal front. In other words, coding.

The second side of the medal is if the careerist already has a family. The goal of any of us is to become free of problems. The lady spends the lion's share of her time at work and on business trips (the higher the duty, the denser the schedule), which means that she has all the hundred percent justification for this. In the sphere of production, some things and issues can sometimes be solved much easier. The subordinate is not a spouse or a child, which means that it will not argue and argue, all requests will be fulfilled without any wrangling.

The family woman puts her mother's functions "even without batting an eye" on tutors, private schools, tutors and other surrogate mothers, while justifying her full employment and high financial income. A good salary, in addition to direct benefits, gives you the full right not to do household chores and keep the spouse in check, if he, God forbid, happens to get less money. So the solution of all personal problems through career career is always comfortable and excludes the reverse side. The more successful a business woman, the more defensively she defends her social views.

For the lady herself, the leadership of the leadership often carries a negative ending. The most vital value is a close-knit human relationship - and they, alas, are not reached. Since relatives and friends are separated from it by means of a money barrier, and subordinates are separated. Whatever you say, this problem is directly related to female subjectivity. The thing is that in our world sometimes you can meet representatives of the weaker sex, which include the group of "problem women." And here it does not matter whether they are careerists or not. She will become a housewife, this will be a complete misfortune for her relatives, first of all, for the kiddies.

And vice versa: the representatives of the fair sex who are able to apply in life all their quality-endowed qualities and advantages - intuition, flexibility, very subtly perceiving the surrounding people, and moreover, plus all the intellectual features that are relevant to their status and position, can in fact be bypassed "in the race for the success "of any, even the most intelligent man.

And lastly, for the first time in thousands of years, women have the opportunity to realize outside the household, so they will not be pushed back any more. But as the practice shows, the number of male spongers is growing significantly! Is not this the basis for the fact that careerists instead of men prefer solitude?